§ 37 Restrictions on power of representation
(1) The directors shall be obligated vis-à-vis the company to observe those restrictions which have been set out in the articles of association as regards the extent of their power to represent the company or, unless otherwise provided therein, by resolutions passed by the shareholders.
(2) A restriction of the directors’ power to represent the company shall have no legal effect in respect of third persons. This shall in particular apply to those cases in which the representation is restricted to certain business or types of business only or only under certain circumstances or for a certain period of time or in specific places, or where the consent of the shareholders or a company organ is required for the conduct of specific business.
Information for non-professionals
To Information for legal professionals
Relevance for legal relations
Section 37 para. 1 GmbHG involves the issue about what a managing director is permitted to do as far as the shareholders' meeting is concerned, while para. 2 involves the issue about what the managing director can do in the external relationship.
1While paragraph 2 hardly plays any role in practice because managing directors are issued either individual or (non-genuine) joint power of representation, paragraph 1 is important. Paragraph 1 describes in effect that a managing director can be bound by the company in the internal relationship despite having generally unrestricted power of representation in the external relationship. A GmbH managing director is different in this respect from a member of the executive board [Vorstand] of a German stock corporation (section 76 German Stock Corporations Act [Aktiengesetz, "AktG"]) who generally conducts the business under his own responsibility. The company can in theory impose far reaching restrictions on the managing director in the internal relationship, for example, that even transactions above a very low threshold in value require the consent of the shareholders' meeting. However, the possibility then can no longer be precluded that the managing director is bound in the internal relationship in such a manner that, in the final analysis, the underlying service agreement must be classified as an employment contract. However, aside from this consequence, any restriction in the internal relationship is possible.
2The restriction is normally not imposed in an individual directive from the shareholders and instead is normally established in the articles of association or on the basis of procedural rules issued for management. The important aspect for the managing director is that such restrictions are only valid if they have been disclosed to the managing director. On the other hand, it is also important for the managing director to absolutely comply with the restriction because exceeding the restriction generally constitutes a violation of duties in the office of a managing director (on this point, section 43 GmbHG), or the violation can lead to termination of the service agreement. A sample set of procedural rules is included following the comments.
Information for legal professionals
1) General
3Section 37 para. 1 GmbHG involves the issue about what a managing director is permitted to do as far as the shareholders' meeting is concerned, while para. 2 involves the issue about what the managing director can do in the external relationship. The issue of legal authority involves the issue of the scope of statutory representative power. This is generally unrestricted, which is a result of the need to protect legal transactions. Internally, i.e. with regard to the issue about the extent to which the managing director is permitted to use the power of representation, the articles of association and rules of procedure, however, can impose broadLenz, in: Michalski, GmbHG, 2 ed. 2010, section 37 no. 10 restrictions on the managing director.
2) Definitions
4a) Scope of management authority
Actions of management consist of all measures and decisions necessary to pursue the purpose of the company, i.e. the management of the company.Zöllner/Noack, in: Baumbach/Hueck, GmbHG, 20 ed. 2013, section 37 no. 2 The term is broad and is limited by the tasks which are assigned to the shareholders' meeting or other corporate bodies on the basis of law or the articles of association.
3) Differentiation, casuistics
21Application of section 37 GmbHG in the case law of the BGH
BGH, judgement dated 30 May 2015 – II ZR 236/03
The sale of the largest part of the company assets of a GmbH is a business action out of the ordinary course of business which also requires a resolution even if the measure does not involve any change in the subject of the business.BGH, judgement dated 30 May 2015 – II ZR 236/03, http://juris.
Author / Law firm
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019-6099 US
T 212 728 8000
F 212 728 8111
Practice areas
AntitrustAsset ManagementGovernment RelationsLitigationReal EstateTaxMergers and AquisitionsEnvironment
Profile of the law firm
Willkie is an elite international law firm of approximately 650 lawyers located in nine offices in six countries. For more than 125 years, we have represented companies across a wide spectrum of businesses and industries, most notably financial services. The firm is comprised of attorneys who are recognized as some of the world’s foremost practitioners in their respective areas.
Client Service
Willkie’s collaborative approach is entrepreneurially inspired and client focused. Clients grow with us over time. They hire us because of our reputation and our experience, and then build longstanding allegiances based on results and the collegial process by which they are achieved. Our focus on client service includes:
- A pragmatic approach to the practice of law that puts the client first and forms the basis for longstanding relationships
- Best-in-class practices that are frequently recognized by peers, clients and independent review publications
- An attention to successful collaboration that encourages our bright and energetic lawyers to serve clients’ needs while maintaining high ethical standards and treating others with respect
- Lawyers who possess the legal knowledge and experience to handle any transaction and the ability to communicate effectively with clients
Our International Reach
Willkie’s international experience—including the representation of U.S. and international corporations throughout all regions of the world—is both deep and broad. Located in key business centers throughout the world, Willkie is comprised of the best local market talent in shared strategic areas of practice. Each of our European offices is ranked and recognized within its country as a top local firm. This is an extraordinary distinction and speaks to our specific focus on having the best local talent in each office. Our ability to provide sound judgment and sophisticated legal advice, coupled with significant knowledge of a region’s particular rules and regulations, financial and political regimes, and customs and culture, ensures that clients seeking to conduct cross-border business get the maximum benefit from our vast experience.
Strategic orientation
Strategically Focused Areas of Practice
Our firm’s shared areas of concentration and services are aligned to ensure high quality and consistently responsive counsel across our international network of offices. Our continuous focus on the synergies within our firm is supported by a firm culture that values collaboration and cooperation.
Offices & lawyers
Brussels, Frankfurt, London, Milan, Paris, Rome
Strategic Alliances
U.K. law firm Dickson Minto
Web page
http://www.willkie.com